Monday, May 30, 2011

Session II:Debate- A Cultural Analysis



A Question To Consider:

Do we have free will? What does free will mean?

Cultural Analysis:

1. What does our culture believe concerning free will?  What do modern people believe about free will?

2. How does modern science  deal with the questions of free will?

For example, think of the science of genetics or brain research.

3. According to modern science, what causes alcoholism?  What causes homosexuality?  What does this say about free will?

Notice: To all those who answer, answer  honestly.  Also, when giving a rebuttal to another's answer, please remember to be respectful.  As I have been told a thousand times, I will tell you: We do not treat people the way they deserve to be treated.  We treat them the way Jesus would treat us.  If you cannot comply with these rules please do not comment.  If you do comment and have not followed these regulations then you will be band from the blog forever.  This does not mean however that you cannot question.  Questioning is always encouraged.  Thank you!


I typed "free will" into the Google search bar and these are the pictures that came up:




















Let me know what you think about the pictures. Which one depicts you belief the best? Do any of them at all? Before you answer these questions you must first answer the cultural analysis first.

I can't wait to hear you responses!!

Friday, May 27, 2011

Session I: Prelude




A question to consider:

What does it mean to be free?

I'm going to take this moment to give you my thoughts. I myself, have been having trouble answering these questions about freedom. I just can't seem to articulate them well enough, to the point that I'm satisfied with them anyway. But I do find it important to answer these questions because they aren't just frivolous questions. The way you know and understand these things, will shape the way you say, act and think. Freedom is a big deal. And the way you see freedom is the way you will see a lot of different things. I'm pretty sure the way I see freedom is different than how most people see freedom. Which is where I'm having trouble. I''m not entirely sure how to articulate what I think and believe about freedom. So bear with me. And you still  have time to try and answer them yourselves! Who knows? Maybe your answers will help me.  Here they are once more:

1. What is freedom?
2. Is freedom the same as "liberty"?
3. Is there any difference between freedom and "license"?
4. Does freedom mean being able to do anything?
5. Are there several different kinds of freedom?
6. Is freedom equal for all people?
7. Is freedom compatible with authority?

So here are the Session I: Chapter II Prelude questions and answers:

1. Who wrote Exodus?

Many historians believe that, like Genesis, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, Exodus was patched together from several different books. But this is not true.

2. Do we know who wrote the book?

Yes we have a very structured and logical guess that Moses wrote the book of Exodus as well as Genesis. The bible gives evidence through several verses such as Exodus 17:4, 24:4, 34:4, 27-29. These verses show Moses writing under the direction of God.


3. What do the letters J, E, D and P stand for?

Each letter stands for a different book that Exodus allegedly came from. J stands for "Jahwist", E stands for "Elohist", D stands for Deuteronomist", and the P book talks a lot about priests.

4.-5. When did Moses live?

Moses lived around 1447 B.C., which is right around the time that the Exodus happened. Many believe this was the time of the Exodus because we know from the bible that the Exodus happened 480 years before Solomon began to build the temple and Solomon built the temple in 967 B.C.

6. What are the alternative dates for the Exodus?

Many believe that  the Exodus happened around 1270 - 1250 B.C. This time is based partly on the names of the cities in Exodus 1:11: Israel works to build Pithom and Ramses, and these cities are built by Seti I (1308-1290 B.C.) or Ramses II (1290 - 1224 B.C.). This is called the "late date" theory.  However there are many problems with this theory.

And that's it for the Prelude. I hope that you have questions or comments. Please...please, please, please.....please....answer the freedom questions. :]



         

Monday, May 23, 2011

Vacation...

Posting will be limited as of Wednesday. Because I'm headed to Florida!!! Yay! Which means I'll have more time to go through my Omnibus I textbook, which then means I'll have a ton to post about. I can't wait!! But first, please go to the freedom questions and answer them here. I really want a few people to answer before I start posting the Analysis questions because that way there'll be more of a discussion. :} So I'll talk you you all in the comments section. The freedom questions can be found in the Summa post.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Joseph

Have you ever heard Josephs story? Here's a little background info on Joseph:


Joseph was the youngest of twelve. His father's name was Jacob. Jacob had a long history too. Jacob's great grandfather was Abraham. And Abraham was a descendant of Shem (one of the sons to survive the great flood with Noah). Needless to say, Joseph has an interesting family tree. 


Anyway, Joseph was the youngest of 12. Yes folks, I said twelve brothers. I can only imagine the kind of hazing this kid got on a daily bases. Joseph was also, openly, the favorite of his father's sons. To be honest, I think I'd hate him too. And to top it all off, Joseph had a couple of dreams that told him that his brothers would one day bow down to him. (Oh Boy.) Josephs brothers hated  him so much, they sold him to slave traders headed to Egypt for a bag of gold. And then lied about it when their father asked what happened!!! "What happened to Joseph?" "Oh...uh...umm...well you see...all eleven of us turned our back for a second and then...uh....this wild boar, who didn't make much noise...uh...hmn...well it came up and uh...well it ate Joseph whole. Yeah!!! Yeah that's what happened!!!" 




Oh yeah. I bet that was a tough dissision: Brother or gold...brother or gold...hmn....which will I choose...hmn....


Anyway, after he was sold to the slave trader the traders brought him to Egypt to be sold to the captain of the palace guard, Potiphar. Now Potiphar had a wife. I'll bet that as the captain gaurd's wife, I'd be a lonely soul. Military life is hard people! But Potiphar's wife was a little extreme. After Joseph had been working in Potiphars house for a while he made a relationship with Potiphar himself. Potiphar look on Joseph as a good servant. 


File:Joseph and Potiphar's Wife.jpg

Ah, Sa La Vi, nothing lasts I suppose. Potiphar's wife tried to have an affair with Joseph and when Joseph told her she was wrong for doing so and that she couldn't act that way with him she got angry and embarrased. Her pride then weld up inside of her and so she told her husband that Joseph tried to attack her. Well wouldn't you know? Potiphar believed his wife and sent Joseph to jail. Yep...to jail. Do you know what jail was like during that time. Let's not talk about it :/

Well, prison was an interesting time or Joseph as well (go figure, what isn't interesting in this mans life?). While in prsion he was put in a cell near two other men. They were both lock in the same as he, one was a baker and the other (for lack of a better word) was a butler. And soon they were talking. One of their conversations was about the dreams they were having. The baker and the butler were worried because they knew their dreams meant something, they just weren't sure what. Joseph told them that God understood dreams and that they should tell Joseph what their dreams were.  Here is what the  butler told Joseph his dream was about:
"In my dream I saw a vine with three branches. As soon as it budded, it blossomed, and its grapes became ripe. I held the king’s cup and squeezed the grapes into it, then I gave the cup to the king."

And Joseph replied, "This is the meaning of your dream. The three branches stand for three days, and in three days the king will pardon you. He will make you his personal servant again, and you will serve him his wine, just as you used to do. But when these good things happen, please don’t forget to tell the king about me, so I can get out of this place. I was kidnapped from the land of the Hebrews, and here in Egypt I haven’t done anything to deserve being thrown in jail."

Then the Baker hearing this was eager to tell Joseph his dream, "I also had a dream. In it I was carrying three breadbaskets stacked on top of my head. The top basket was full of all kinds of baked things for the king, but birds were eating them."

Joseph replied, "This is the meaning of your dream. The three baskets are three days, and in three days the king will have you killed.”

Ouch. Kick me, why don't you!

Three days later, while the king was celebrating his birthday with a dinner, he sent for his personal servant and the chief cook. He put the personal servant back in his old job and had the cook put to death.

Everything happened just as Joseph had said it would, but the king’s personal servant completely forgot about Joseph.


And then quite a long time past...and then the king had a dream and it went like this: 

He was standing by the NileRiver, when seven cows, fat and sleek, came up out of the river and began to feed on the grass. After them, there were seven other cows, ugly and gaunt.  They came up out of the NileRiver and stood on the bank.  And those ugly and gaunt cows ate up the seven sleek, fat cows. 

Then he had another dream:

There were seven heads of grain, good and healthy which were growing on a single stalk. After them were another seven other heads of grains sprouted which were thin and scorched by the east wind.  The thin heads of grain swallowed up the seven good and healthy full heads of grain. 


The king looked everywhere for someone to interpret this dream, but he found no one. And then, "Oh yeah!' said the butler. "I know a man! He's still in jail. He interpreted my dream and the bakers and it all came true. You should go get him." So after two years the butler finally remembered. 

So the Pharaoh sent for Joseph and Joseph  interpreted his dream and said to him:

"The two dreams mean the same thing; God has told you what he is going to do.  The seven fat cows represent the seven years, and the seven full heads of grain are also seven years; they all have same meaning.  The seven thin cows which came up later and the seven thin heads of grains scorched by the desert wind on the other hand represent the seven years of famine.  God has shown to you what he is going to do, just like what I have told you. There will be seven years of great abundance all over the land of Egypt.  There will be seven years of famine after that and all the good years will be forgotten, because the famine will ruin the country. The years of abundance will be totally forgotten, because the famine which follows will be so terrible.  The recurrence of your dream means that the matter has already been fixed by God and He will make things happen in the near future."

And now the Pharaoh should choose some man with wisdom and insight and put him in charge of the country.  During the seven years of plenty harvest you must also appoint other officials and take a fifth of the crops.  During the good years that are coming, you have to order them to collect all the food and give them authority to store up grains in the cities but have them guarded.  The foods that were stored will be reserve supply for the country during the seven years of famine which are going to come on Egypt.  The people will not starve in this way.”

And do you know who he chose to put in charge of those things? 

Joseph.

Yes Joseph became second only to the king....


O.O

Crazy.

So of course the famine came and Joseph made Egypt ready. They stored all their food and gave out food during the famine. But the famine reached passed Egypt. Reached all the way back to Josephs family. And now comes the brothers again. The brothers were sent to Egypt to get some food. The youngest of them (Benjamin) was left behind with their father. Joseph invited them in. And wouldn't you know? They didn't recognize him. Long story short (although this is my favorite part, but this post is just getting so long. Go read the rest of it in Genesis) After they came back the second time, they bowed down to him and he revealed himself. He hugged them and wished them only good will. In Josephs mind his brothers sold him into Gods will.  

So what do you think? Can God use the sins of the whole world to fulfill His great works? Gee. I wonder. :]


Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Template Difficulties :/

Sorry about the template difficulties. I just got on my blog for the first time since the whole blogger incident and now I have no template. Unfortunately I forgot what it was called so I can't go search for it on my computer. So I'll probably have a new one up by the time you see this. Thanks for your patience.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Summa

How can God accomplish His Purposes through sinful actions of human beings and still be holy, just and good?


Answer this question to the best of your ability.  And the following questions will lead into the next chapter:



Is freedom the same as "liberty"?
Is there any difference between freedom and "licence"?
Are there different kinds of freedom?
Is freedom compatible with authority?
Is freedom equal for all people?

????? Truth ?????????????? Truth ?????

Session IV: Analysis Answers

A Question to Consider:

What is a covenant?

Reread Genesis 9:1-17 and Genesis 15

Discuss the following questions:

1. According to the similarities of these passages, what is a covenant?


According to the similarities of these passages, a covenant is a promise made by both parties. (i.e. I'll do this if you do this). But it seems to me that man always breaks his side of the bargain and God always keeps His promise even if you don't. Or if you don't keep your side of the bargain He will still fulfill if word but maybe in another way that doesn't bless you directly. 

2. One theologian has said that God's covenant is basically a relationship (or bond) of life or death significance ruled over by God. What do you see in these two passages that supports this view?


Well, in the first about Noah, Noah had no choice but to trust God because otherwise he would have drown  There really wasn't a choice here. It was either sink or swim (and then drown). So Noah trusted God and it ended up being the best choice.


Abraham didn't trust God and chose to fulfill Gods words on his own time. That didn't work out, because now he has damaged the life of another family. God said, nope. My time, or no time at all. And it will be My time, I assure you. Without God's covenant with Abraham showed that the whole covenant really relied on Him (God), and not on Abraham at all. 
3. What are the essential parts of a covenant?


Part One: A Promise
Part Two: An Agreement on both sides to keep that promise.
Part Three: The fulfillment of that promise.

Friday, May 6, 2011

Session IV: Analysis


A Question to Consider:

What is a covenant?

Reread Genesis 9:1-17 and Genesis 15

Discuss the following questions:

1. According to the similarities of these passages, what is a covenant?

2. One theologian has said that God's covenant is basically a relationship (or bond) of life or death significance ruled over by God. What do you see in these two passages that supports this view?

3. What are the essential parts of a covenant?

Please leave comments! I love reading and responding to them.

Session III: Discussion Cultural Analysis, part 2

Here are my answers for the questions:


A Question to Consider:
 Should someone ever be punished or rewarded for the actions of another?



Q: In athletic events, if one player does something wrong (i.e. misses an easy fly ball), is it fair for his whole team to be punished for it (i.e. lose the game)?

The whole point of being part of a team is that you work together to win together...just like a family does :] So, yes. The whole team should lose because of one persons mistakes.

Q:If a child robbed a store, what would our culture say about send the parents of that thieving child to jail?

Honestly, I do believe that people in America would, maybe not ask for the parents to go to jail, but they would sew them. We are a "sew happy nation" and it's pretty much the same thing; having the parent pay for the child's faults. The  only thing that's different in these situations is that one has to do with a game and the other has to do with personal sin. 

Q: Why does our culture act differently in these circumstances? Is this biblical? 

Our culture acts differently to these circumstances because they are different. One issue has nothing to do with sin, it's just a game. But the other (thieving child) has to do with personal sin. 

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Session III: Discussion Cultural Analysis


Read Genesis 11:27-37:1

The following will be organized in a question only format. Later on, in another post, I will give my answers. All comments are warmly welcomed and appreciated. Let me know some of your opinions.

A Question to Consider:
 Should someone ever be punished or rewarded for the actions of another?


Q: In athletic events, if one player does something wrong (i.e. misses an easy fly ball), is it fair for his whole team to be punished for it (i.e. lose the game)?

Q:If a child robbed a store, what would our culture say about send the parents of that thieving child to jail?

Q: Why does our culture act differently in these circumstances? Is this biblical? 

Monday, May 2, 2011

Session II: Debate, part 2


Here is my paragraph response as to what my position is on Creation:

If you look at the last post's comments, you will see that  the first comment is from Jane (aka. Kait, my buddy). She puts,quite simply,  her position is from a 7 24-Hour Day position. And for this reason: When God said, "On the second day" it doesn't take a whole scientific research team to figure out that He meant..."On the second day". I agree 100%. Here is my question to those who don't share my beliefs on this subject: Don't you think God (the omnipotent, all knowing, ever present God of everything) would have taken into consideration all your doubts and questions so much so that he would have made the passage more clear if you were right? Or in laymen terms: Don't you think He would have thought to tell you if it was otherwise a 24-Hour Day language He was speaking in? I mean really. Our God is not dumb. If He said it took 7 days, then by golly...IT TOOK 7 DAYS! Also, science can be used for good and bad (just like everything in the world that can be manipulated). People can use it to further their own ideas, or further the truth. Science is not the issue here, it's the scientist. Which is why it's so important that we as a people talk about these things, because the way you "see" God will determine EVERYTHING you do.