Wednesday, August 17, 2011

The Epic of Gilgamesh


We have no started Chapter Three, which is all about the Epic of Gilgamesh. I am providing the intro in this post so you can get a little bit of a point of view. 

Introduction:

Have you ever felt like you were living in a story? Like people were watching you but you could never catch them peaking behind the bushes? The security cameras are just too well hidden, and every body seems to know their lines so well. 
In a very real sense all of us are living in a story, God is telling a grand epic, and all of us have our role.All of the actors, save One, have one thing in common. All of mankind has fallen and is need of a savior. The bible is the story of that fall, of God's preparations of the coming of His Savoir, and finally, coming of our Savior, Jesus Christ. He is the grand hero of this epic. No one can escape God's story. Some of Adam's children come to understand and love this story. They believe in the story of Christ's work of faith and love and know it to be true description of what God has done and is doing in this word. Others, however, refuse to believe this. Because of this they are caught in an odd predicament. They live as characters in a story that they don't believe, and they can't make they story be untrue by not believing in it. So they must make up lies about the story in which they are characters. Still, they continue to lie about the word and pretend that the world works differently from what God declares in the bible. But deep in their hearts their consciences tells them otherwise.  They can't get out of the tale, and even when they try to get out, they are just playing their roles. As one of our  poets, famous rock band Jethro Tull, has said,"The monkey willing to strike up the tune". 


When Christians tell stories, they tell stories that picture to us the world that God created. C.S. Lewis does this very well in his Chronicles of Narnia. Even though Aslan is not Jesus Christ, he still teaches us about Jesus. He is a sort of Christ figure in that he shows us a small picture of what Christ has done for us. Lewis understood that mankind has fallen and that the salvation God offers us in the person of Jesus Christ is our only hope. And so the story that he tells gives us a small picture of man's fallen condition and of God's cure for this fallen condition. 


Pagans, who live outside of the covenant with the God of the bible, frequently have Christ figures as well, even though their overall stories are lies. They know that mankind has fallen, but in their unbelief they must invent their own ways to solve man's fallen condition. And so pagans have false christs in their stories, men who attempt to drag men out of their fallen condition without recognizing the saving work of Jesus Christ. History is full of these wicked men. 


Hitler thought that he could remake mankind and reverse the curse by changing the genetic makeup of the world. He thought he could save the world if only he could make everyone white.


 Acts 12:20-24 tells the story of Herod Agrippa who thought that his ability to supply people of Tyre and Sidon with bread qualified  him as a messiah. God struck him down for his presumption, and he was eaten from the inside out by worms. 


Literature is also full of these sorts of men. Tolkien's Saruman thought that his machines from Orthanc could remake the world and usher in a new age. Tolkien, a Christian, had him learn a similar lesson to that of Herod Agrippa. 

These are always false christs, and Gilgamesh is one of the pagan world's most famous false christs. 

- Itroduction to Chapter 3, Omnibus I (17-18)

8 comments:

Jonathan said...

You're right when you state that mankind realizes it has fallen and literature does as well. Take Joseph Conrad's story "The Heart Of Darkness". Man does recognize his fallen state, but most people, unsaved individuals, fail to find a way to restore themselves.

Unknown said...

Or fail to realize they can't save themselves and that there is only one way to be saved from this condition.

Anonymous said...

I think saying we've fallen means that you just personally are unhappy with the state that we are in. everyone has a different idea of what fallen and ascending are...and just because you disagree doesnt mean they are automatically less right than you are.

Unknown said...

So like...what about murder...do you not think that's a symptom of a fallen man?

Unknown said...

Anon --

According to Dictionary.com, the definition of the word "fallen" is "Subject to sin or depravity.". In which case, by the dictionary, your definition of fallen is incorrect. The Fall was when man fell into sin. A state of depravity, a separation from God.
Ascending is to move upward, so I don't really understand how you can relate fallen to ascending.
And I'm not sure what you mean by that last comment.

Anonymous said...

to "nonners": i actually do think it is a symptom of a TYPE of "fallen" man. but not the fallen youre talking about. i think fallen in the sense of a murderer isnt to be blamed on any sort of flying red faced man or anything like that. i think people murder because of other people. because of people pressuring us to do whatever they think we should be doing, and giving no substantial reason for doing so. opposition gets to people eventually, and in weaker minds, creates killers. to "jane": someone wrote the dictionary too. and other people than dictionary writers have ideas of the word fallen too. "ive fallen and i cant get up." commercials dont use fallen in that sense. so i see no opposition there...fallen and ascending are opposites. thats how they relate. separate poles. and the last comment means basically...how can you say someone has fallen when nearly everyone is going to tell you a different meaning of the world fallen. you would have to prove that your meaning of the word is correct, and i dont believe there is any way for you to do so.

Unknown said...

Hahaha. Fallen and I can't get up...funny.

Okay, so where did you learn right from wrong? Lets just start there...

Jonathan said...

Nonners:Give Anonymous a chance to argue his point.

Anonymous:Just because everyone has different ideas as to what "fallen" means doesn't mean that they are right. In fact all of them are wrong except the right one. That may seem redundant so let me put it another way. There can only be one right definition for a word.
(Different definitions for different meanings of words such as "lay" He lay the bricks. He lay on the ground.)
Do you, Anonymous, have a definition for fallen? If so, is it correct? To quote you "i dont believe there is any way for you to do so."

Post a Comment